EVOLUTION QUESTION - 1984			L. PETERSON/AP BIOLOGY
	Describe the modern theory of evolution and discuss how it is supported by
	evidence from two of the following three areas:
		a.  Population genetics
		b.  Molecular biology
		c.   Comparative anatomy and embryology
 
  
  STANDARDS:
     No paper may receive more than 12 points unless 2 sections from ABC and
     description of the Modern Theory are covered.
  DESCRIPTION OF THE MODERN EVOLUTION THEORY
  __Synthesis Theory
  __Darwin
  __work of Darwin, contribution
  __role of Natural Selection: 
  __ survival
  __ variability
  __ overpopulation
  __ gene perpetuation
  * all of the above must have explanation
  __effects of mutation
  POPULATION GENETICS                   (6 points - max.)
  __definition
  __fusion of Darwin and Mendel
  __Hardy-Weinberg 
  __mathematical Model
  __assumptions and explanation
  __(OR negative/i.e. nonrandom mating, mutation, etc.)
  __genetic drift
  __types and example
  __equilibrium or stability (loss = evolution)
  __mechanism of speciation (isolation, barriers)
  __coevolution
  __adaptive radiation (gene pool)
  MOLECULAR BIOLOGY                (6 points - max.)
  __genetic variation from mutation
  __types of mutation (addition, substitution, etc.)
  __heterozygote vigor
  __example
  __comparative Biochemistry (DNA, cytochrome C, protein, amino acid sequence)
  __carbohydrate metabolism
  __common molecule/common function
  __phylogenetic trees from amino acid sequence
  __biochemistry techniques: hybridization of DNA, sequencing, etc.
  
  COMPARATIVE ANATOMY/EMBRYOLOGY        (6 points - max.)
  __definition/description
  __convergent evolution
  __divergent evolution
  __example
  __homologous/analogous
  __vestigial organs
  __example of above
  __adaptive radiation (structural aspects)
  __comparison of larval stages
  __comparison of embryos
  __common ancestor for close resemblance
  __example (max 1):
     heart chambers
     gill slits/pharyngeal pouches
     tails
     cervical vertebrae
  plus 1 for good explanation of revision of Haekel's theory